In our last Battery Live Talk before the summer break, we will dive into the ongoing discussions around the comparison between second life applications and recycling in the context of batteries. For this virtual panel discussion, we are happy to welcome Jan Tytgat, Umicore, and Michael Drechsel, Intelligent Energy System Services.
The energy density of batteries has made substantial advancements in recent years, allowing for the storage of significantly more energy with fewer raw materials. Meanwhile, the costs of raw materials used in batteries have experienced a significant increase, resulting in consistently high prices in certain cases. Additionally, the accessibility of these materials is controlled by only a few countries. To address this situation, the EU has proposed the Critical Raw Materials Act, which suggests the establishment of recycling quotas as benchmarks.
At the same time, the utilization of second life applications presents an opportunity to prolong the lifespan of battery storage. By doing so, we can not only reduce costs but also save energy, as the production of new batteries becomes unnecessary. The proposed draft EU Regulation suggests that batteries should meet specific criteria at the end of their lifecycle, including undergoing a "health check" prior to repurposing. This approach, combined with extended producer responsibility obligations, aims to encourage battery repurposing while ensuring compliance with EU waste regulations and fostering consumer trust in the second-life battery market.
What will be addressed?
- When should we decide to recycle a battery instead of considering it for a second life application?
- Will the costs for remanufacturing or recycling impact the likelihood of losing used batteries and their materials through exports?
- Given the uneven distribution of recycling and remanufacturing facilities, will logistical and regulatory challenges ultimately determine whether a battery is recycled or remanufactured?
Participation is free of charge.
